Adventures in the Screen Trade by William Goldman - Review

Overview

Adventures in the Screen Trade was published in 1983 and remains one of the most entertaining and clear-eyed books ever written about Hollywood. William Goldman was not a screenwriting teacher or a story consultant. He was a working screenwriter with two Academy Awards (Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid and All the President's Men) and a career that spanned four decades. This book is his account of what that career was actually like.

It is not a how-to manual. There are no structural diagrams, no beat sheets, no exercises. Goldman tells stories: about films that worked and films that didn't, about directors and actors and studio executives, about the gap between what everyone thinks Hollywood is and what it actually is. The book is funny, honest, occasionally brutal, and deeply informed by the experience of a writer who spent decades working at the highest level of the industry.

If you want to learn screenplay structure, read Syd Field. If you want to learn what happens to your screenplay after you've structured it perfectly and sent it out into the world, read William Goldman.

Nobody Knows Anything

Goldman's most famous line is the one that opens the book's Hollywood section: "Nobody knows anything." It's become so widely quoted that it's lost some of its original force, so it's worth understanding exactly what he meant.

He wasn't saying that people in Hollywood are stupid. He was saying that no one, not the smartest executive, not the most experienced producer, not the most successful director, can predict with any certainty whether a film will succeed or fail. Every film is a prototype. Every release is an experiment. The history of Hollywood is littered with films that everyone expected to be hits that flopped, and films that everyone expected to flop that became classics.

Goldman backs this up with specific examples. Raiders of the Lost Ark was turned down by every studio except Paramount. Star Wars was nearly killed multiple times during production. Meanwhile, films with perfect pedigrees (top directors, top stars, big budgets) have regularly opened and died. The lesson is humbling: quality and commercial success are not reliably correlated, and anyone who tells you they can predict the market is deluding themselves.

"Nobody knows anything" is not an argument for nihilism. Goldman spent his entire career trying to write the best scripts he could. The point is that effort and quality are worth pursuing for their own sake, because outcomes are beyond anyone's control.

Goldman's Career

Part of what makes the book so valuable is the career behind it. Goldman wasn't a one-hit wonder dispensing advice. He had an extraordinary body of work to draw from, and he's candid about both his successes and failures.

Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969) - Goldman sold the original screenplay for a then-record price. The studio wanted Jack Lemmon and someone else for the leads. Paul Newman campaigned for the role. Goldman writes frankly about how little control a screenwriter has over casting decisions that can make or break a film.

All the President's Men (1976) - A masterclass in adaptation. Goldman's challenge was turning a sprawling piece of investigative journalism into a dramatic narrative with a ticking clock. His solution, ending the film midway through the Watergate story at the point of maximum uncertainty, is a structural decision that most books on screenplay structure don't even consider.

The Princess Bride (1987) - Written after this book was published, but Goldman had been trying to get it made for years and discusses the difficulty of selling a project that doesn't fit neatly into any genre. The film was originally dismissed by executives who couldn't figure out how to market it.

Goldman also writes about his less successful films (A Bridge Too Far, The Great Waldo Pepper) with the same honesty. He doesn't pretend that everything he touched turned to gold, and that willingness to examine failure is one of the book's most instructive qualities.

Behind the Scenes

Goldman structures the book as a tour of Hollywood's ecosystem. He devotes chapters to stars, directors, producers, and studio executives, analyzing how each group thinks and what motivates their decisions. The portraits are specific and often surprising.

On stars: Goldman observes that a star's primary concern is not whether a script is good but whether their role is good. A star will pass on a brilliant script with a supporting role and accept a mediocre script with a lead. This isn't vanity. It's economic rationality. A star's career depends on being the center of the movie.

On directors: Goldman is blunt about the tension between writers and directors. A director will almost always rewrite the script, even if it doesn't need rewriting, because directing is fundamentally an act of authorship. Goldman doesn't resent this. He accepts it as the nature of the medium, but he's clear-eyed about what it means for writers.

On studios: The decision-making process is driven by fear. Executives are primarily motivated by not getting fired, which means they'd rather make a safe, conventional choice than take a risk on something original. Goldman doesn't blame them (the economics of film production make risk genuinely dangerous) but he shows how this dynamic shapes the kind of movies that get made.

Goldman's behind-the-scenes analysis is forty years old, and the industry has changed significantly since then: streaming, the decline of the spec script market, the shift to franchise filmmaking. But the human dynamics he describes (fear, ego, the gap between creative intent and commercial reality) are timeless.

Writing Advice

Goldman does include writing advice, though it's woven into anecdotes rather than organized into a system. Some of the most valuable insights:

Screenplays are structure. Goldman says this repeatedly and means it. A screenplay can survive imperfect dialogue, thin characters, even plot holes, but it cannot survive a broken structure. Getting the bones right is the essential task.

Enter scenes as late as possible, leave as early as possible. This is one of the most practical pieces of screenwriting advice ever given. Most scenes in most scripts start too early (with greetings, pleasantries, preamble) and end too late (with goodbyes, transitions, summaries). Cut to the essential conflict and get out.

The audience is always ahead of you. Viewers are sophisticated. They've seen thousands of stories and they're constantly predicting what will happen next. Your job is to fulfill their expectations in unexpected ways, to give them what they want in a form they didn't anticipate.

The book's final section includes a practical demonstration: Goldman takes a short story and, in real time, adapts it into a screenplay, narrating his thought process as he goes. It's a fascinating look at how a professional writer actually thinks through creative problems. Not in the clean, systematic way that most books describe, but messily, with wrong turns and reversals and moments of uncertainty.

Strengths

The book's greatest strength is its authenticity. Goldman isn't theorizing about Hollywood from a university office. He's reporting from the trenches, with decades of firsthand experience. His observations carry the weight of lived reality, and his willingness to be honest about failure, frustration, and the limits of his own talent gives the book a credibility that most screenwriting books lack.

Goldman is also a superb writer in prose. The book is genuinely funny and compulsively readable. You won't put it down out of obligation. You'll keep reading because you want to know what happens next, which is itself a lesson in storytelling.

The book also provides a realistic picture of what a screenwriting career actually looks like. Most books focus on writing and ignore the business. Goldman covers both, and his portrait of the industry (messy, irrational, occasionally magical) is the most honest one you'll find.

Who Should Read This

Everyone who is serious about screenwriting should read this book. Not because it will teach you three-act structure or how to format a script (it won't) but because it will give you an honest understanding of the world your scripts will enter. That understanding is as important as any structural technique.

It's particularly valuable for writers who are past the beginner stage and starting to think about their career. If you're submitting scripts, taking meetings, or wondering how the development process works, Goldman's account is required reading. The industry has changed in many specifics since 1983, but the underlying dynamics (the power relationships, the decision-making calculus, the role of luck) have not.

Read it after you've read a structural guide like Screenplay or Save the Cat!, after you understand how to build a script but before you understand what happens to it once it's built. Goldman's book fills in the rest of the picture, and it does so with a wit and honesty that makes it one of the few screenwriting books you'll want to read more than once.

Goldman published a sequel in 2000, Which Lie Did I Tell?, that covers the second half of his career, including The Princess Bride, Misery, and Maverick. It's nearly as good as the original and extends many of the themes discussed here.